A. From July 14, 2014 to July 9, 2017, the Plaintiff worked as the director of the sewage administration division at the waterworks and sewerage business office (hereinafter “sewage administration division”) and was in charge of the overall management of sewage administration and affairs, such as the elderly sewage culvert, etc.

(b) Attached Form for sewage administration division

1. In 2015, the emergency repair work for the old sewage culvert (hereinafter referred to as “first repair work”) was performed, as stated in the Emergency Repair Work for the old sewage culvert, and attached Form;

2. In 2016, the Emergency Repair and Maintenance Works was performed through the Nowon Sewage culvert in 2016 (hereinafter “Secondary Repair and Maintenance Works”).

C. On May 7, 2017, the Defendant: (a) conducted a comprehensive audit on the above water supply and sewerage business offices; (b) discovered issues, such as the method of construction of new technology and construction volume for repairing sewage pipes; (c) unfair selection of construction volume; and (d) failure to file a claim for damages against unfair collaborative acts (tender collusion); and (c) found the Gyeonggi-do Personnel

3. A request for a minor disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff, who is the director of sewage administration and division, and the head of the team team of sewage facility 2 team, for a minor disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff, and a minor disciplinary measure against the Director D affiliated with sewage facility 2 team.

hereinafter the attached Form

3. In a case where the grounds for disciplinary action are individually referred, the pertinent grounds for disciplinary action shall be attached thereto.

on the other hand, annex

3. The grounds for disciplinary action No. 6 are limited to the Plaintiff.

(D) The Director of the Water and Wastewater Works Division requested the Defendant to review the request for a reduction of the request for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff and C, but the Defendant dismissed the request on August 2017. (e) Gyeonggi-do Personnel Committee’s dismissal on September 20, 2017, on the ground that the Plaintiff et al. violated the duty of good faith under Article 48 of the Local Public Officials Act, thereby falling under Article 69(1)2 of the same Act, the Plaintiff’s suspension from office for one month, one month, one month, one month, and three months (in case of suspension from office, and mitigation of commendation) of the reduction of salary to C (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”).

B. The Company had held that the Company

(f).