The Defendant is a resident of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B lending (hereinafter “instant lending”) (hereinafter “instant lending”), and the victim D is a person who resides in the instant lending subparagraph d, and is soon scheduled to be a director.

On 1:00 on 07. 00. 07. 11:00, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that the Defendant demanded the victim to share the cost of drilling without the victim’s prior consent or permission; (b) confirmed that the victim’s dwelling view is open; and (c) infringed upon the victim’s residence without permission.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of D or F;

1. The statement of D and F [the defendant asserts that the defendant only talks about the issue of cost sharing with the victim and the toilet drain pipe outside of the entrance of this case on the day of this case, and that there was no entry into the above subparagraph. The above evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of this case is as follows. ① The defendant, on the day of this case, demanded the victim to share the cost of drilling the toilet drain pipe, and entered the new outbreak of the above E-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S-S

1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won under the suspended sentence;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. There is no criminal record of the same kind of crime under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code, and multiples of toilets of this case from which the defendant resides.