However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On May 2013, 2013, the Defendant posted a letter “D” on the PC bulletin board of the Internet portal site E Cabbber’s E Cabbbbber, stating that “Gallon jumop jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum jum ju

6.4. To send 100,000 won to the victim F who reported and contacted such fact;

6. It is intended to send Samsung Dogal lusium lusium 2 until 7.

‘False speech' was made.

However, even if the victim receives money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to send Samsung gallon juthy lusium 2.

The Defendant, as such, deceiving the victim and deceiving him, is the same year from the victim.

6. 4. 13:52: (a) around 13:52, the Defendant received KRW 100,000 from one bank account (G) in the name of the Defendant; and (b) from that time until June 7, 2013, the sum of KRW 289,000 from three victims over three occasions as indicated in the following list of crimes was deposited in the said one bank account.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided property by deceiving the victims.

On June 4, 2013, 13: (a) on June 4, 2013, 13: (b) by posting a false sales statement stating that “The galthalthalthal galthal galthal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal rithal riths of 19:4 H 9,000 won 3:51 I 90,000 won on June 7, 2013, the summary of the evidence acquired by defrauding 289,

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each statement of F and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of search, seizure and verification warrant reply;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime committed under the corresponding Article of the Act and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (The following conditions of sentencing are considered as favorable among the reasons for sentencing).