대여금
1. The defendant
A. Plaintiff A: KRW 10 million; KRW 3 million to Plaintiff B; and KRW 15,773,000 to Plaintiff C; and each of them.
1. According to each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 11, and 13, there is no dispute between the parties to the judgment as to the cause of the claim, or according to the records of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7, 11, and 13, the defendant and F engaged in the livestock industry that raises a lawsuit while operating a restaurant together while maintaining a de facto marital relationship from around 2006 to August 2014, the plaintiff A deposited the above money in the account under the name of the defendant under the name of the defendant, the amount of KRW 10 million on July 19, 2010, the amount of KRW 5 million on February 11, 2010, and the amount of KRW 5 million on the account under the defendant’s name, the spouse of
Examining the above settlement amount of KRW 1,100,000 on September 19, 201 with the account under the name of the defendant, and KRW 2,00,000 on May 12, 2011 by the plaintiff D respectively, with the account under the name of the defendant; KRW 1,503,00 on August 24, 201 with the credit card under the name of the plaintiff C; KRW 1,482,00 on October 4, 201; KRW 234,00 on November 234, 201; and KRW 1,54,00 on April 26, 201, each of the above settlement amounts is acknowledged to have been purchased in the name of the defendant under the name of the defendant under the name of the defendant, and the plaintiffs were to have been removed from the above settlement amount under the name of the defendant under the name of the defendant under the name of the non-law de facto marriage or under the name of the defendant under the following circumstances.