2. In full view of the following facts: (a) the instant crime committed by the Defendant without any reason was brought in injury to the victim at the end of the dispute over the victim’s abusive view; (b) the Defendant was punished several times as violent crimes; and (c) the Defendant had other records of punishment; (d) the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances leading to the commission of the crime; and (e) all of the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, including the circumstances after the commission of the crime; (b) the victimized person does not want to be punished by the Defendant; and (c) the Defendant’s disability with the interest of the recipient of basic life who suffered from the payment of the benefits of the recipient of basic life, and the economic situation is not good, even if the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.