A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, the period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is the captain of "Dho", a fishing vessel destroyed by extinction, and Defendant B is the captain of "Eho", a fishing vessel destroyed by extinction.

1. Defendant A

A. On October 201, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around the G convenience store in the Gu of Chang-gu, Changwon-si; (b) took a bath to drink with H; and (c) was called out after having been reported by a person who was not killed in his/her name, and was called out after having been reported to him/her; and (c) the police officer was asked to check from K to check the Ha; and (d) the J expressed his/her desire to read “Sero gue, spath, spath, and spath, spath,” and the Defendant intending to drive the Hah to check the Hah; and (e) the Defendant intending to stop to drive the Hah from the Hah, kn-kh, spath, spah and spath, and spathn to the Hah’s chest.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the prevention and suppression of crimes.

B. The Defendant damaged property at the above date, at the above time, and at the above place, the victim L, which was placed in front of the above convenience point, destroyed a fluorous waste fluoring a alinium fluor in the market price of the victim L, which was placed in front of the above convenience point.

2. Defendant B and M attempted to stop the arrest of a flagrant offender who was arrested by J and K due to the above act at the above time, place, and at the above time and place, Defendant B and M attempted to stop.

In other words, M is dint of the dint of being on the part of K, “I are not dead;

In addition, Doz. Doz.

“......... by hand, K’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’, and

Whether it is good or not;

"................ means J’s arms and descendants, and the body of J was faced with the wall by being pushed down.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with M and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The legal statement of Defendant M, above, 1.