2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant made a confession of the crime, (b) the defendant has no previous conviction, (c) the victim reported immediately after the crime was committed and voluntarily surrenders to the police officer; and (d) the victim agreed with the victim, etc.; (b) there are favorable sentencing grounds for taking the victim of a cleaning agent after intrusion upon the dormitory; and (c) considering all such factors as the reason for unfavorable sentencing, including the defendant's age, family relation, economic situation, circumstances leading to the crime, and motive leading up to the crime; and (d) the records and changes in the records of this case, the punishment of the court below is reasonable; and (e) there is no change of circumstances to consider in the

3. As such, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it has no reason to file an appeal. It is so decided as per Disposition by the lower court [The lower court’s judgment that did not deem that the period of registration of personal information under Article 45(4) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, which is a sex offense subject to registration of new information, becomes final and conclusive, the Defendant becomes a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and has a duty to submit personal information to the competent agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act. In full view of the statutory penalty, crime quality, criminal punishment, and aggravated punishment of each of the instant crimes, the lower court’s judgment is justifiable].