However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person with no certain occupation, who is a fluoral force of the lives of violent organizations, the base of which is the lurgical lurging.

The Defendant jointly with B, C, D, E, and F, on March 17, 2010 from around 18:00 to around 18:00, the Defendant instructed the victim I (24 years of age) who was lurgly fluored from the H main point in the fourth floor of the G Building in Daegu Northern-gu, to be the time when the victim I (24 years of age) was hurged, for example, not for the vessel on board the vessel, and assaulted the Defendant and E as the victim’s time when C, D, and C, the Defendant and E were fluorly fluorly fluoring net of the victim with a dangerous object, and the victim’s klusium fluor in five times, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol on B, C, E, or D;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement of I;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime concerned, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see the following reasons for sentencing) for discretionary mitigation;

1. The instant crime of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (see the following grounds for sentencing) is very poor that the Defendant collectively used excessive violence to the victim, who is the cause of the distribution organization, on the grounds of the establishment of the machinery of the organization when the Defendant was working as a member of the organization of violence, and the nature of the crime is very poor, and it is reasonable to impose strict punishment corresponding to the criminal liability regardless of the agreement, regardless of the agreement.

However, the defendant seems to have committed a crime against the defendant, which leads to the confession of the crime to the investigation agency and this court, and is in depth divided, and it seems that he is engaged in his occupation after withdrawal from the currently violent organization. Such circumstances and the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, details and method of the crime, frequency of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered only once.