A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by a fine of five million won, and the defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months.

(2).

The Defendants are persons in a de facto marital relationship, who jointly operate the “E” on the net-si D2 floor.

From January 2016 to July 28, 2016, the Defendants employed two shower rooms, one employees waiting room, and two female employees, including F, in size of about 60 square meters in size with nine partitions, from male customers who find out the place, and received 80,000 won in cash from them and paid 40,000 won out of them to female employees, the Defendants caused the said female employees to interfere with a similar act against male customers on an average daily basis, by means of causing them to be able to make a correct sense with male visitors’ sexual intercourse in the room and to stimulate them by hand.

As a result, Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

The Defendants’ legal statement F of the Defendants, the protocol of seizure of police statements against G, details of approval of credit cards of the list of seizure, and the application of the business registration certificate statutes.

1. Article 19(2)1 and Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning criminal facts, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor and a fine; Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor; Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor);

2. Defendant A who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act.

3. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

4. Defendant A who observe the protection: Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act.

5. Defendant B: Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc.

6. Defendant A: Reasons for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act [the scope of recommendation] ; the grounds for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act ; the two types of sexual traffic crimes subject to 19 years of age or older (such as brokerage of commercial sex acts due to business and payment of prices; etc.) / [the sentence of June or 1 year and 4] / The defendants reflect the defendants' criminal act; Defendant B was punished by a fine for a similar crime; Defendant A was punished by a suspended sentence in 199; the size of business and profits; and the Defendants’ age.