When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

around 01:00 on December 27, 2018, the Defendant driven the said taxi from the long distance in front of the south-gu C at port to the E-broadcasting station on the side.

In this case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the new code.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left on the straight line in violation of the signal, and received the part of the victim F.(59 years old) driving at D from the right edge of the Madon Road, leading up to D from the right edge of the Madon Road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, from the victim H, who is a passenger of the Defendant’s taxi (the 37-year-old age), the injury, such as the 1 fage fage at a single fage fage fage, other than the 1 fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage fage, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for report on internal investigation (referring to the attachment of studio booms and videos);

1. Article 3 (1), proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;