A. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor (ten months of imprisonment) is too unhued and unfair.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. We also examine the judgment prosecutor and the defendant's arguments.

The crime of this case is provided with communication equipment, transmission number change service, etc. to the Bosing Fraud, which facilitates the criminal act of this case, which is becoming a serious social problem, and thus there is a strict need for punishment. The defendant, despite clearly knowing that communication equipment, service, etc. provided by him are used for the criminal act of this case, he received considerable amount of consideration while providing a lot of equipment and service for several years. The defendant is highly likely to be subject to criticism. The defendant is not directly involved in the criminal act of this case. The defendant is not directly involved in the criminal act of this case. The defendant's favorable circumstances, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstances leading to the criminal act of this case, and the motive and circumstances leading to the criminal act of this case, the defendant's allegation that the defendant's seizure of this case should not be justified, and the defendant's allegation that the defendant's seizure of this case should be justified after considering all the following reasons.

The court below ruled that there is no evidence to see it and rejected it legally.