beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2013.10.30 2013고단725

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year;

However, the above sentence shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle E15 tons LPG tank.

On March 3, 2013, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of about 40 km in the speed of about 40 km from the Dol-ri red Dol-ri red Dol-si, Pyeongtaek-si, one of the two-lanes of the Dol-si red Dol-si.

At the same time, there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, so a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving safely according to the new code.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant neglected this and proceeds from the red signal, the Defendant received from the left side of the running direction of the truck of the truck of the Defendant to the right side of the victim B's driver who was straighted in accordance with normal signal, as the front side of the truck of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, the injury of the victim B (the 22 years of age), such as dynasium and dynasium, including his/her fynasium and fynasium, and the injury of the head part (the 21 years of age) that requires treatment for about six months, such as the impairment of the gynasium and the gynasium, etc., of the damaged vehicle G (the 21 years of age). On March 3, 2013, the Defendant caused the death of the victim victim H of the damaged vehicle due to two damage from the gynas.

2. Defendant B

A. On March 3, 2013, at around 00:45, the Defendant was driving the F Aburg-lurged vehicle owned by the Defendant without obtaining a driver’s license from around about 20km section from the front side of the agricultural village in the city of Pyeongtaek-si to the red driving distance of the city of Pyeongtaek-si in the city of Pyeongtaek-si.

B. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act

In the date, at the time, and at the place of the mandatory insurance, the passenger car owned by the defendant was operated without purchasing the insurance policy.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.