2. The judgment of the court below was led to the confession and reflect of the defendant, and the defendant agreed with the victim of confinement. However, even though the defendant had been punished several times due to the act of the same kind and the act of the crime committed several times, the defendant administered phiphones again despite the fact that the defendant had been punished for imprisonment four times due to the administration of phiphones, and the defendant threatened and detained the victim with a knife and threatened the victim, and the nature of the crime is not poor. In full view of the various circumstances, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, motive, means, and consequence of the crime of this case, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.