However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

On July 3, 2007, the Defendant entered Vietnam as an employment visa and imposed the period of stay on May 2, 2012, and thus was in a state of illegal stay, and was in a state of illegal stay from October 2012, and was in a state of attendance with the Victim C (V, 27 years of age) from around October 2012.

1. On September 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) exchanged text messages with the victim on September 27, 2013; (b) mispercing that the victim had another male; and (c) found the victim’s residence on the Hosi-gu D 2nd floor in Changwon-si, Sungwon-si; and (d) caused the victim’s loss in the room, the Defendant stolen and stolen one wall with a 1020,000,000 won of the market price of Samsung No. 2 mobile phone, three credit cards, and 30,000 won of cash.

2. The Defendant, as described in the above paragraph (1), stolen the victim’s cell phones and wallets, and attempted to confirm the victim’s text messages on the unclaimed land, and did not confirm the victim’s text messages. In order to comply with the male problem, at around 24:00 on the same day, the Defendant put a door door at the victim’s residence, but did not open the door so that the repair cost would be approximately KRW 30,00 won of the entrance door, thereby damaging the victim’s dwelling, thereby impairing the repair cost, putting him/her away from the door so that the repair cost would be KRW 30,00,000 of the entrance door, and invaded the victim’s dwelling.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statement of the defendant (the second court date);

1. Statement by the prosecution against C;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment against the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Part concerning the rejection of prosecution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the circumstances leading to the crime and the fact that the victim does not want the punishment of the defendant);

1. The Defendant’s summary of the facts charged is the victim at the victim’s residence located on September 27, 2013, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si.