해고무효확인
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, and this case is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasoning of the judgment of the court of the first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of the first instance,
6 pages 2 of the first instance court ruling "from February 1, 2002" shall be amended to " February 1, 2002", and "in return" of the same 8th instance judgment, "as of November 8, 2014" shall be added to "as of November 201."
An amendment to the table Nos. 13 at the bottom of the fourth judgment of the court of first instance to the term “ September 10, 2014” and the term “2014: October 1, 2014” in the table No. 26 to the term “No. 1, 2014” respectively.
On January 30, 2015, the decision of the first instance court was rendered on January 30, 2015. The dismissal ruling was made on January 30, 2015. The correction was made on April 23, 2015, and was made on April 23, 2015.
At the bottom of the 8th judgment of the first instance court, the "12 times in extraordinary service" shall be revised to "seven times in extraordinary service", and the "Evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 2, 3, and 17 (including each serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply)" shall be revised to "Nos. 1, 2, 3, 23, 17, 22, 24, 25, 26 (including a serial number; hereinafter the same shall apply)" at the bottom of the same 2,3 of the same 2, and "Nos. 1, 2, 3, 23, 17, 17, 22, 24, 25, and 26 (including a serial number if
9 pages 11 of the decision of the first instance court shall be amended to 32 times in total.
On the 10th 9th 10th 2nd 9th 10th son of the first instance judgment, “the back 6th son of the front line” was read as “the second 6th son of the front line,” “each entry or image of evidence No. 6, 15, and evidence No. 27-1” at the bottom of the same 6th 10th 6th 6th st st st 201, “the Defendant” at the bottom of the same 3rd st st st 27th st st 2014, and “the Plaintiff’s bus was stopped at the end of the same st st 27th st st 2014 at the end of the same st 2nd 27th 2014, but it is recognized that the above bus was stopped and stopped at the end of 33 second st st st st st 27th 2014.