2. Although part of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime and speaks against the defendant, the fact that the investigative agency agreed smoothly with the victims, etc., the above favorable circumstances seems to have already been reflected in the court below. The crime of this case is an insulting speech and use of violence within the store under the influence of alcohol, and the nature of the crime is not good. In full view of other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant and his defense counsel's allegation of unfair sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, ex officio in accordance with Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, the second half of the judgment of the court below shall be changed to "the victim F who has raised an objection" by converting "the victim E who has raised an objection" into "the victim E who has raised an objection").