A. On July 27, 2014, at around 10:29, when driving D vehicles owned by C, which entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the Plaintiff, and making a left-hand turn to the left at the private distance intersection in the Daejeon Seo-gu B 106 apartment complex, F shocked the left-hand side (the front side of the driver’s seat even and the front part) of the E vehicle owned by the Defendant, which was going straight from the right-hand side.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The above vehicles driven by the Defendant are MINI Cooper S Counyman, which constitute external vehicles.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff asserts that in the instant accident, the Defendant’s negligence constituted 30%, and the Defendant’s 960,400 won (i.e., 196,000 won x 70% x 70%) and 200,000 won per 1 million won for raping for the damaged parts of the accident (e.g., fryer and fryer). As such, the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay damages to the Defendant in relation to the instant accident does not exist in excess of 1,240,000 won.

B. The instant case commenced with the conciliation application, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not reach an agreement in the conciliation procedure that attended both the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the Defendant seems to dispute without recognizing the Plaintiff’s above assertion.

(other than that, no written response has been submitted). 3. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the accident of this case did not carefully examine the movement of another vehicle that the F is directly engaged in left turn at the intersection and occurred due to shock with the vehicle driven by the Defendant. Thus, the F and its insurer are jointly and severally liable to compensate the Defendant for the damages incurred by the accident of this case.

However, in the course of proceeding the private distance in the apartment house even with the defendant, the accident of this case should be examined well and the progress of the operation of other vehicles.