2. Article 208 (3) 3 of the Applicable Civil Procedure Act (Judgment by service of public notice);

3. In addition to the property damage suffered by the defendant, the plaintiff partially dismissed claims KRW 21,00,000 as compensation for mental damage.

In general, in a case where a property right is infringed due to a tort of another person, the mental suffering shall be deemed to be recovered from the compensation for the property damage, unless there are special circumstances, and in a case where there is any irrecoverable mental damage, the compensation for the property damage can be recognized.

Therefore, in light of the above legal principles, it is difficult to recognize that the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone is insufficient to recognize that there was an irrecoverable mental damage solely on the compensation for property damage, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise. In light of the above legal principles, the health team, the Plaintiff’s investment in the money to believe that the Defendant was a pro-friendly job offering, and the Plaintiff incurred property loss due to the Plaintiff’s lending of the vehicle. However, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff is insufficient to acknowledge that there was an irrecoverable mental damage solely on the compensation for property damage.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim for this part cannot be accepted.