2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is divided into his mistake, and that part of the damage recovery has been made.

However, the defendant committed the crime of this case again even if he had been tried for the same kind of crime, and even though the amount of damage was a significant amount, it was not most of the damage recovery until the trial of the case, and considering the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not deemed unfair because the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.