A. The Defendant, who runs a housing rental business under the trade name of “D”, constructed 14 units of F apartment units 14, 802 units of F apartment units, which are public construction rental houses, on the ground of “D” and completed registration of preservation of ownership for each household around August 28, 2003.

B. On October 7, 2003, Plaintiff A leased and resided 105 dong 1203 (hereinafter “105 dong 1203”) among the above apartment units from the Defendant, and the deposit for final lease of the above apartment units paid by Plaintiff A to the Defendant is KRW 50,604,00. C. Plaintiff B leased and resided 110 dong 1405 (hereinafter “10 dong 1405”) from the Defendant around January 2008, and the deposit for final lease of the above apartment units paid by Plaintiff B to the Defendant is KRW 52,809,000.

On November 12, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a lawsuit seeking the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each of the above apartment units after obtaining approval for the conversion into sale in the wooden market, but the defendant did not comply with the conversion into sale, and filed a lawsuit seeking the registration of ownership transfer with respect to each of the above apartment units. The plaintiff's judgment that "the defendant is paid KRW 83,730,064 from the plaintiff to the plaintiff, and at the same time he is paid KRW 83,730,064 from the plaintiff to the defendant, the defendant shall carry out the procedures for the registration of ownership transfer due to sale on June 9, 2017 (this Court Decision 2017Da52130), and the plaintiff's judgment that "the defendant shall receive KRW 89,540,225 from the plaintiff Eul, while receiving KRW 89,540,225 from the plaintiff Eul, the plaintiff's execution of the registration of ownership transfer due to the sale on April 12, 2017.

E. On March 29, 2018, the Plaintiffs deposited the Defendant as the depositee and deposited all the pre-sale conversion price pursuant to each of the above rulings, and completed each registration of ownership transfer on each of the above apartments.

F. The plaintiffs filed the lawsuit against the defendant in this case and claimed the return of each lease deposit to the defendant under each of the above lease agreements.