2. The judgment that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflected his mistake, and the degree of injury (such as light failure requiring treatment for about two weeks) caused by the crime of this case does not seem to be serious, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim at the court below is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant has been punished three times for the same crime as the crime of this case, and is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In full view of the above circumstances and other circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is deemed appropriate as a punishment within the scope of the discretion of sentencing.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.