However, as to the Defendants for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with C around April 22, 2002.

On March 2013, the Defendant, at the end of Pyeongtaek-si around the end of March, 2013, sent to B more than seven times in total, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table, along with one-time sexual intercourse with B at the dwelling room of the Defendant in Pyeongtaek-si.

2. Defendant B knew that the above spouse was a spouse, and even at the same time and place as that of the preceding paragraph, the above Defendant had sexual intercourses with the above A seven times in total, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the Institute of Receipt and Certification;

1. Article applicable to criminal facts;

(a) Defendant A: the first sentence of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Act

B. Defendant B: The latter part of Article 241(1) of the Criminal Code

1. Defendants from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act; and

1. Defendants in a suspended sentence: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do148, Apr. 1, 2