When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

around 10:50 on August 19, 2018, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault by assaulting his/her employee in the “C” market in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si, and receiving 112 reports and arresting him/her as a flagrant offender under E, etc., who was dispatched to the scene.

At around 11:10 on the same day, the Defendant asked the Defendant to ask his personal information, and provided the Defendant with a desire to “this ring, fluor,” without any justifiable reason, to “this rings, fluor, fluor, fluor,” and then assaulted E’s left fluorbbbs where he continued to restrain E’s right bucks, and asked E’s personal information.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by police officers and the prevention and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act that apply to the crime, the selection of a fine (including violence exercised by the defendant and the degree of interference with public duties resulting therefrom, and the fact that there is no record of punishment for the same crime, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;