교통사고처리특례법위반등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is the person who is engaged in the operation of the Malaysia.
On November 22, 2013, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.214% of blood alcohol concentration on November 22, 2013, had the national highways No. 18, e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.
At the time, it was a local national highway in rural areas where street lights were not installed at night and there was a center line of yellow solid lines, so a person engaged in driving duties of motor vehicles has a duty of care to take into account the progress of the motor vehicle well and prevent accidents by driving the central line without harming it.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left on the upper corner of the above tin by negligence, and caused the Defendant’s injury to the left, from the right edge of the Defendant’s proceeding to the left edge, the D small-scale car driven by the victim C(24 years old) who was going to the same tine of the erode of the same military base from the erogic scopic scopic scopic scopic (24 years old) to operate the traffic signs set up on the right edge of the Defendant who intruded the central line to avoid the vehicle of the Defendant, thereby causing the victim C to face the traffic signs set up on the side, which require approximately two weeks medical treatment, and the victim E (24 years old) suffers from the injury of the erogic scopic scopic scopic scops and tensions requiring two weeks medical treatment.
2. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 0.214% of the blood alcohol concentration on the date and time set forth in paragraph (1) of this Article, and the Defendant was driving a Bracon vehicle from the parking lot of 574, e.g., the e., the e., the g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1.C and E, respectively.