However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 23, 2015, around 16:40 on November 23, 2015, the Defendant stolen the Defendant’s possession of approximately KRW 529,00,00, which was placed on the display stand at the display stand in C department stores in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E store for the victim of the first floor D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act in the suspension of execution (including the fact that the injured party does not want punishment but has recovered damaged articles);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) and the main sentence of Article 62-2(2) of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation / [the scope of recommending punishment] / The mitigation area (one to six months from January), the mitigation area (one-six months from neglect, etc.) of types of larceny for general property / [the decision of a special mitigation person] the non-exclusive penalty (the decision of a sentence], although there are many criminal offenses against the defendant.

Even if the sentence is determined within the scope of the recommended sentence in consideration of the above circumstances, the execution of the sentence shall be suspended.