도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable on the grounds of appeal.
2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s mistake is divided, and that the alcohol concentration in blood is not high.
However, considering the fact that the nature of the crime of this case is not good, the defendant committed again during the period of repeated crime even though he had been tried for the same kind of crime, the balance of sentencing with the same crime, the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and other conditions of sentencing specified in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion by the defendant is without merit
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.