However, as to the defendants, two years from the date of this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. Defendant A around September 4, 2017, around 21:45, around 2017, the victim B (the remaining, 63 years of age) and Si fat around the Do Council members located in Sinsan City, and Defendant A saw the victim’s breath, “only 63 years of age,” and fat the victim’s face four times by drinking fat, and the victim’s head and hand fat, which is a dangerous object, put the victim’s head and hand fat and the second hand fat, where it is difficult to identify the number of days when the victim’s head and hand fat are five times.

2. Defendant B left side of the head, where the number of days of treatment can not be known due to two times when the victim’s chest was satisfed with the victim A (the remaining and 55 years old) at the time and place described in paragraph (1), and the victim’s chest was satisfed with the victim’s chest, and satisfed with the red brick which is a dangerous object after satisfing the sat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Reduction of a small amount under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [the scope of recommendation] general injury [the scope of recommendation] under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act shall be determined as ordered by taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the basic area (4 months to one year and six months) [the person who is specially mitigated] [the decision of the sentence] where the Defendants committed a crime by carrying a deadly weapon or other dangerous articles [the decision of the sentence] that the Defendants are against the mistake; (b) Defendant A did not have any record of being punished for the same kind of crime; (c) Defendant B did not have any record of being punished for the same crime; (d) there was no record of being punished for the same crime; (d) Defendant B did not want the punishment by mutual agreement; and (e) other Defendants’ age, circumstances leading to the instant