2. There are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and took an attitude against the defendant, and that the defendant seems to have continued to commit the crime of this case, who suffered economic difficulties.

However, considering the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, it is necessary to punish the illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, and the defendant has been subject to punishment several times in the past, and even though he has been subjected to a suspended sentence, the defendant committed the crime in this case at another time during the suspended period, and other various circumstances, which are the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed unfair since the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.