If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

1. On April 12, 2012, the Defendant, who interfered with business, was under the influence of alcohol at the D convenience store where the victim C (at 53 years old), who is an employee in Ulsan-gu B, is working in Ulsan-gu.

The Defendant, without any justifiable reason, expressed the victim’s desire to “Frauded, even before, and after the year,” and obstructed the victim’s business operations for about 20 minutes, such as breaking the victim’s scam with the hand floor, and scam and scams against customers entering the convenience store, by doing so.

2. At around 02:40 on the same day of the obstruction of performance of official duties, the head of Ulsannam Police Station F District Office in the same Gu E voluntarily operated and investigated for the last time, as described in the preceding paragraph, by refusing to accompany the police station, and she went through the office, and thereafter, G (51) upon entering and leaving the district in which the police station was located and G (51). The head of the Gu expressed a desire to “the police officer’s dogbs and Chewing felbs” to the police officer, and the reason why G was said to go out of the district and go home to go out of the district, and the head of the Gu would interfere with a police officer’s legitimate performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer, such as at the time of her batch with his/her floor, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to C, G, and H;

1. Photographs at the time of accompanying the suspect or H;

1. Photographs photographs of police officers G violence levels;

1. Application of the CCTV output photograph Acts and subordinate statutes, the criminal scene of which is photographed;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of each fine for the crime;

1.Article 37 (former part), Articles 38(1)2 and 50 of the Criminal Code among concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;