At around 06:40 on June 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) brought a dispute with the victim D (the age of 52) on the ground that he was involved in an examination of himself within the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City film export packing enterprise; (b) brought an injury to the victim, she fladddd the bat of the victim’s bat, and fladd the body of the victim on the ground that he was on the floor, and sustained approximately eight weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a medical certificate of injury, damage photograph, and investigation report (the details of health insurance benefits of a complainant);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the judgment of conviction and the reasons for sentencing;

1. The Defendant asserts that, although he was fighting with the victim's body, such act did not inflict an injury on the victim, such as the victim's opening of the right dog, which requires eight weeks' medical treatment.

However, the above evidence and the following facts recognized by the victim are relatively and consistently stated that "the victim fights with the defendant who was placed in each item and the body of the victim in this court, and the defendant was sealed to the right part of each item, with the right part of the victim's body, and forced to undergo treatment to the hospital on that day, as long as the right part can not immediately be left immediately after the victim was pushed." The victim complained of the above evidence that it is difficult for the hospital to take the body at that time because the victim was visited to the hospital on that day, and the doctor in charge was required to conduct a close inspection, and the victim did not have any details of medical treatment visited the hospital by the pain's pain during the six days prior to that of this case. Thus, the victim's act can be acknowledged to have caused injury to the victim.