beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.07.19 2017고정466

모욕

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant uses the “C” as a member of the Internet community website as the “D”.

The Defendant, at around 21:00 on November 2, 2016, was the clinic of “E” on the website and “E”, and at the same time, the Defendant was overfinited.

I see the liquor tax summary every one.

In the letter of 'Wood', the author posted the comments "to see it in a fluorous manner like the fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor', thereby openly insulting the complainant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Data upon the closure of a notice [the evidence adopted and examined by this Court: (a) the face of the complainant was disclosed due to the attachment of a black image for the vehicle; (b) the name, birth year, and residence of the complainant was specified in the notice; and (c) the closed user of the notice “G” on November 3, 2016, written “personal information” in the notice “H and I prepared on the surface of the vehicle and on the surface of the body of the victim,” and the hat in the notice.

The defendant's assertion that the defendant's face and personal information of the complainant were disclosed at the time of committing the crime is not accepted, since the post post posted the comments "," it is recognized that he/she handled the face of the speaker's face, which is the victim in the image attached, deleted personal information, and then deleted the same purport.

In addition, the defendant asserts that he was unable to expect the complainant to confirm his comments, or that the complainant predicted and was able to predict such insulting comments, but whether the complainant's writing is confirmed or not does not require the establishment of the offense of insult, and the defendant's assertion that the complainant was able to accept the insult is nothing more than the defendant's single assertion.

B. I comments on the comments posted by the defendant.