except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 20, 2014, at around 03:40, the Defendant was demanded to return home and return home from G in the background of the light police station F District where the Defendant was dispatched after receiving a 112 report from a taxi engineer who does not pay a taxi fee.

이에 피고인은 위 G에게 “개새끼들 내가 뭘 잘못했는데”라고 욕설을 하고, 오른 손바닥으로 위 G의 왼쪽 뺨을 1회 때려 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to G and H

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) that the defendant is seriously against the defendant's living in custody, Article 62 (1) was agreed with the taxi engineer, deposited KRW 1,00,000 for the victimized police officer, there is no record of punishment for obstruction of performance of official duties, details of the defendant's birth I'