If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The Defendant is a person driving a rocketing car.

피고인은 2018. 3. 10. 01:36 경 의정부 D에 있는 E 편의점 앞 도로에서, ‘ 술에 취한 것 같은 데 쏘나타 승용차를 운전하려고 한다’ 는 112 신고를 받고 출동한 의정부 경찰서 F 지구대 소속 순경 G으로부터 음주 감지기 반응이 있고, 술 냄새가 나며, 얼굴에 홍조를 띠고 횡설수설하며 시동을 켠 채로 위 승용차 안에서 자고 있는 등 술에 취한 상태에서 운전하였다고

인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있어 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 방법으로 음주 측정 요구를 받고도, 2018. 3. 10. 02:26 경부터 02:48 경까지 3회에 걸쳐 음주측정기에 입김을 불어넣는 시늉만하며 음주 측정을 회피하여 정당한 이유 없이 경찰공무원의 음주 측정 요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Informing a criminal investigation report, the ledger of use of drinking measuring instruments, notification to departments related to reporting 112 incidents, and application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 148-2 (1) 2 and Article 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting a crime, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the Defendant’s refusal to measure drinking of this case during the period of

However, the defendant does not have a previous record of driving alcohol or refusal to measure drinking, while being the period of repeated offense, but is the period of repeated offense of this species, and the punishment shall be determined by selecting a fine only once in consideration of the reflection.