However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On April 11, 2015, the Defendant damaged property: (a) around 23:15, the victim B (59 years old) who was waiting for a taxi at the bus stops located in the middle school in front of the middle school bus stops located in the same route, Jung-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and (b) the victim, C, and C, and C, and the victim’s breath of breath, and breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath, so

The Defendant: (a) caused the victim who wanted to take the above scambling, to see this scambling; (b) caused the scambling that is far away from the floor, and (c) destroyed the scambling that is the part of the victim to repair the scambling that is the part of the victim.

2. The Defendant: (a) received a report on the act of assaulting B, etc. and destroying property at the time and place mentioned in the preceding paragraph and received a report of 112, and was dispatched to the Defendant, and was asked by the circumstances E during the dispatch of the police box at the time; (b) and (c) received questioning from the guard E of the police box belonging to the Jungran Police Station, and (d) received a visit to the said E, and (c) took the ethbbb

When the Defendant was removed from E, the Defendant she dumped to the Gap's own floor, and assaulted the parts below E, such as cutting off the parts under the title of E.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted police officers to interfere with legitimate execution of duties concerning criminal investigation and prevention of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police statement statute to B, C, and E;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of obstructing the performance of official duties on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is a crime that has undermined the legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus, the State’s legal order and order and eradicates the light of public authority.