2. The Defendant also asserted to the effect that the above facts were alleged to be erroneous, and the lower court rejected the above assertion by providing a detailed statement on the judgment.

In light of the detailed situation at the time of committing the instant crime, the victim’s investigative agency and court of the court below’s consistent statement, the shape and degree of the body of the victim’s injury to the victim (which was taken immediately immediately after the instant case, and has been placed in a hole around the victim’s eye, mouth, ear, etc.) as well as the diagnosis of the written diagnosis of injury (the closure frame of inside and outside walls, and the closure frame of the spelkes), etc., the Defendant may be recognized as having inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts constituting the instant crime in the judgment below.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below is just, and the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.