The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below, the court below was just in finding the Defendant guilty of the instant facts charged (excluding the charge of obstruction of business as of October 26, 2010 and the part of innocence) on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. In so doing, the court below did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on the concept of “business” under the Act on the Assembly and Demonstration, the scope of “meeting” under the Assembly and Demonstration Act, joint principal offender, legitimate act, self-defense

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.