When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C&L car.

On May 12, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car at around 01:38, and driven the road in front of the E pharmacy at 1,000, at a speed of about 30 km from the side of the National Bank of Korea to the modern apartment.

Since there is an intersection where signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to ensure that there is a motor vehicle in a stop in accordance with the signals by checking well the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not neglect the above duty of care and did so as to damage the 492,314 won of repairing the said cab by shocking the part of the fences adjacent to the H cab driver’s seat, which is the victim of the F cab in the opposite part, owned by the H cab driver in the opposite part.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle shall immediately stop the motor vehicle and take necessary measures, such as arranging the site.

Nevertheless, the Defendant immediately stopped and did not take necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black boxes and video CDs;

1. Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. As to the defense counsel’s assertion under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the detention of a workhouse, the defense counsel did not recognize the fact of accident at the time, and the Defendant did not fall into non-products due to the instant accident, and there was no need to take measures after the accident.

The argument is asserted.

In light of the background of the instant accident recognized by the aforementioned evidence, the degree of damage of the vehicle driven by the Defendant, etc., the Defendant is deemed to be aware of the instant accident. Therefore, this part of the allegation is rejected.

A measure after an accident;