2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

[Supplementary Use] Part 2 of Part 15 of Part 2 is as follows: “The amount of dividends to the Defendant is KRW 88,00,000,00, the amount of dividends to the Appointed E is KRW 20,603,547, the amount of dividends to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is KRW 20,854,893, the amount of dividends to the Appointed Party A is KRW 5,168,328,” and the amount of dividends to the Appointed Party A is as KRW 16,17 in Part 16,17.

The term "Plaintiffs" in Chapters 2 through 6 shall be deemed to read "Plaintiffs, etc.", "Plaintiff D" to read "Plaintiffs," "Plaintiff E" to read "Appointed E," and "Plaintiff A" to read "Appointed A."

After the 3rd 1st 1st 'the receipt of a dividend', the "in collusion with F" was added to the following "the second 'the chief '',' and the 13th 'the 16th 'the 16th 'the 13th 'the 16th ' was paid' as follows.

F sold 10,195 square meters in total, 200 square meters in total, which correspond to the F’s share ratio among the land in the eight parcels, including the instant shares, to the Plaintiff around May 1989, 250 square meters in total, to E around May 1990, 50 square meters in total, and 200 square meters in total to A around August 1990, and the Plaintiff et al. paid the full amount of each purchase price to F at around that time. The land transaction permission zone was not “land transaction permission zone”, and the Plaintiff and the Appointer E written confirmation (Evidence A 2 and 3) from “not having been “not having been” in the 5th sentence to “not having been” in the 5th sentence. The confirmation of the purchase price is referred to as “the purchase price.”