However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Cuba in the Republic of Korea.

On December 11, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 18:25 on December 11, 2014, and got the front of the 2-dong Mapo-dong Mapo-dong Mapo-dong Mapo-dong Mapo-dong Mapo-dong Mapo-dong Mapo-dong to turn to the left from

At the time, it was night and its location was a private-distance intersection in which crosswalks are installed, so there was a duty of care to safely drive the crosswalks after thoroughly examining whether there is a pedestrian walking along the crosswalks by reducing the speed and thoroughly performing the duty of putting the driver on the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to perform his duty at the front time, and thereby failed to confirm the victim D (58 3,00) who was a pedestrian crossing to a domestic elementary school by neglecting his duty at the front time, and thereby received the victim as the front part of the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as a baby saliva, which requires approximately eight weeks of medical treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. The actual survey report and photographs related to traffic accidents;

1. Medical certificates and photographs of an injury inflicted on a victim;

1. Application of CCTV video recording CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor, concerning criminal facts;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The basic area (from April to October) of the sentencing criteria [the scope of recommended punishment] and the basic area (the person who is subject to special sentencing] of the types of general traffic accidents; and

2. The defendant did not agree with the victim because the specific reasons for sentencing did not cause considerable damage to the victim due to the crime of this case, and the victim's vehicle that the defendant driving the defendant wanting to punish the defendant is covered by a comprehensive insurance.