2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the Defendant’s vehicle is covered by a comprehensive motor vehicle insurance policy, and the Defendant agreed separately with the victims, the degree of the accident and the injury suffered by the victims are relatively minor, and the Defendant is breaking the Defendant’s attitude toward an investigative agency in depth, the Defendant has already been punished three times due to drinking driving, and even during the period of suspension of the execution due to the act of causing a traffic accident while driving under the influence of alcohol, resulting in the instant accident causing human damage by causing the instant accident.

At the time of the instant case, the blood alcohol concentration level is 0.171% and the distance of the vehicle is 10km.

In light of such unfavorable circumstances and other conditions of sentencing as the Defendant’s age and environment, it does not seem that the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.