(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.05.21 2014고단1014
도로법위반
Text
The defendant is innocent.
Reasons
1. A’s violation of restrictions on vehicle operation on January 9, 2006, which is an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, around 07:04;
2. The provision of the former Road Act, which applied to the above facts charged, was retroactively invalidated by the Constitutional Court that rendered a decision of unconstitutionality.
Therefore, since the above facts charged constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
참조조문
-도로법