2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is against the wrongness while recognizing all of the crimes, and that the defendant pays 40 million won as criminal agreement amount to the victim's side at the investigation stage, and prepares a written agreement with the husband and children of the victim.

However, the crime of this case was committed in a state where the defendant violated the signal while driving the crosswalk and suffered serious injury to the victim. The crime of this case seems to have a very heavy crime, and the victim's family members appear to suffer from an economic and mental pain, but it is difficult to recover sufficient damage due to the victim's subscription to liability insurance. The above agreement is not prepared in a state where the victim's hospital financing is urgent, and it is sufficient to compensate for damage. Although the defendant prepared a written agreement with the victim in a state where there is no family member, the mother of the defendant was prepared only with the victim in the state where the victim's family member did not have the victim's family member, but rather, the victim's family member was able to suffer severe punishment, and the victim's family member was also able to return additional agreement 10 million won to the victim's family member, and the victim's family member also appears to have been subject to punishment before and after the crime of this case, the defendant's crime of this case was committed under the circumstances where it was committed under the same age of the defendant.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and thus, it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.