When the defendant does not pay the above fine, it shall be for ten days.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Raba and freight vehicle B.

On May 29, 2020, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at around 22:55, and led to the intersection of the monthly parallel distance from the mal region to the mountain region of the mal region at the ethic rithic rithic rithic rithic rithic rithic rithic ri

Since there is an intersection where a signal apparatus is installed, there is a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by proceeding in accordance with the signals as instructed by the signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and went to turn to the left by entering the intersection even though the signal of the front line was a stop signal, and due to the negligence of entering the intersection, and making a left turn to the left, followed by the victim C (Y, 58 years old) who was straight from the right edge of the road in the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding to the front left-hand distance of the vehicle in the direction of the vehicle proceeding by the driver C (W, 58 years old) driving the front part of the left-hand side of the vehicle operated by the Defendant.

After all, the defendant suffered, by negligence in the above duties, a scarcity of a scarcity that requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim C, and a scarcity and a tension that require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim E ( South, 52 years old) who was on board the above G80 car.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes to the Defendant’s legal statement F and E, each written fact-finding report (1) (2) each of the diagnosis documents and video CDs

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (amount of money to be converted to a workhouse: 100,000 won per day);

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the order of provisional payment is relatively heavy for the defendant to commit the traffic accident in this case. Although the defendant's negligence is long, he has been punished by a fine for the same kind of crime.

However, on the other hand, the accident vehicle of this case is covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance.