When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 14, 2014, the Defendant tried to go on a taxi on his house, and the taxi driver did not speak the accurate location to the taxi driver, and thus, the taxi driver was on September 14, 2014, entering the babbbs box 278 o-ro 278 o-ro 14 and identified the location of the Defendant’s residence.

At that time, the Defendant and the above taxi engineer were to have entered a police box due to the problem of taxi fabage, “I am the same fabbage. I am fably fab. I am fab. I am fab. I am fab. I am fab. I am fab. I am amb. I am amb. I am amb. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am ambab. I am am fab.)

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;