업무상횡령등
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the evidence duly admitted by the court below and the relevant legal principles, the court below is just to have found the defendant guilty of taking property in breach of trust among the facts charged in this case for the reasons stated in its holding. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the specification of facts charged or the
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.