2. The fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and the first offender are favorable circumstances.

On the other hand, the crime of this case was committed in excess of the victim who demanded the hedging of the defendant, and threatened the victim on several occasions as if the victim and his will would be harming them, and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the content of the crime. The defendant's crime of this case appears to have been one of the important causes causing the suicide of the victim, and the victim's bereaved family members did not agree with the victim's bereaved family members, and the victim's bereaved family members want to punish the defendant's severe punishment from the court below to the court below.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered in the trial of the political party, and in full view of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit and thus dismissed pursuant to Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.