However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant stated in the indictment at around 01:30 on January 9, 2016 as “21:20 on the indictment.” However, according to the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is recognized that the date and time of the crime constituted “01:30 on the basis of the evidence,” and that there is no hindrance to the Defendant’s exercise of the right to defense, and thus,

At the entrance search stand at the entrance of a casino in Gangwon-do, Seowon-gun, Seowon-gun, Gangwon-do, 265, the person requested to present his/her identification card to enter the casino, presented his/her resident registration certificate under the name of the head of Nowon-gu in Seoul, Nowon-gu, a forged official document, as if he/she were the true resident registration certificate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] ; consideration, such as forgery, alteration, etc. of official documents, in cases where social risks have not been realized because the ultimate objective of the crime was not achieved (a person subject to special mitigation] because he/she failed to achieve the ultimate objective of the crime; consideration of the fact that he/she has no criminal record of the same kind of punishment for six months in imprisonment or for one year in suspension of execution;