성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)등
The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
The lower court did not err in its judgment that it is difficult to consider that there are special circumstances to prevent the Defendant from restricting employment, and that the lower court sentenced the employment restriction order to institutions, etc. related to children and juveniles and welfare facilities for the disabled for five
In addition, according to Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for more than ten years is imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing
In this case where a more minor sentence is imposed on the defendant, the argument that the punishment is too unreasonable is not a legitimate ground for appeal.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.