2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the court of first instance.

In the first instance judgment, 2 pages 12 to 16 shall be amended as follows:

[In light of the Defendant’s wrongful criminal complaint, the Plaintiff received mental shock, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff a solatium of KRW 10 million and delay damages therefor. ] The Defendant revised the first instance judgment of KRW 3 11-12 to “Mison fact” to “Mison the Plaintiff managing the money in question according to the evidence No. 1, the Plaintiff’s management of the money in question, and the remainder was returned to KRW 19,00,000 among them, and the Plaintiff did not return it.”

The judgment of the court of first instance on the 3rd page 16th page " " cannot be seen" is a matter to be proved through the examination of the merits (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2003Da44387, 44394, Oct. 7, 2005). Since the plaintiff's lawsuit against the defendant is for the confirmation of the plaintiff's right to demand performance and for the performance order against the defendant, it is difficult to see the defendant's standing to be the defendant. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's standing to be a party exists by the plaintiff's assertion that there is any defect in the party's standing, but in the lawsuit for performance, the plaintiff and the defendant are in the party's right to demand performance, which is a subject matter of lawsuit, and whether there is a right to demand performance or not is actually a right to demand performance (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2003Da44394, Oct. 7, 2005).

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is delivered with this conclusion.