Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

2. In light of the fact that the defendant's wages and retirement allowances not paid by the due date are large amounts, there is a need to punish the defendant strictly.

However, in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes and reflects his mistake; (b) D expressed his intent that the Defendant does not want criminal punishment against the Defendant by mutual consent with the Defendant at the time of the trial; (c) the Defendant is the primary offender; and (d) other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, family environment, and circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant is somewhat unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the defendant's appeal is with merit.

Criminal facts

The summary of the evidence and the facts charged against the defendant recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 109 (1) and Article 36 of the Labor Standards Act concerning criminal facts, Articles 109 (1) and 36 of the Act on the Selection of Punishment, and Article 44 subparagraph 1 and Article 9 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;